Glendix has been making the rounds on the web lately, with coverage from OSNews, Reddit, and even a Russian site, Linux.org.ru. It’s really motivating to see some buzz around the project, giving me the extra boost needed to push the completion of a usable release!
Some of the major obstacles that have to be crossed before making a beta-quality release are the completion of critical synthetic filesystems – especially /net and /draw. We also have to work out the kinks with per-process namespaces and union mounts. I don’t know if we’ll be able to get Rio running as a WM before an official release; if not, Plan9Port‘s Rio and WMII are good candidates.
The biggest criticism of Glendix seems to be the reasoning that Plan9 user-space tools are somehow superior to their GNU counterparts, and several people have asked us to substantiate our claims. At this point, however, I don’t think that it is really important, or even relevant. Even if Plan9 user-space tools aren’t somehow better – I think it is generally a refreshing idea to see Linux combined with a user-space other than GNU.
We’re at FOSS.IN this year, where a large number of kernel developers have gathered; and I hope to get some of their valuable input on the problems Glendix currently faces, and maybe even write some code to solve them
Thanks for all the community support and critical comments, they are all very vital feedback for the project and are much appreciated!
I think that a new user space for Linux is always good news (even if it is from BSD or the Heirloom project). I am not a GNU fan. But the question is:
-Will it be possible build your Linux Kernel fork with the Plan9 compiler and plan9 build tools?
I think that something like Wine o cygwin are a better approach than Glendix or the plan9ports.