<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Binary Sunrise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kix.in/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kix.in</link>
	<description>Anant Narayanan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Behind the Mozilla Apps Developer Preview by Mozilla Labs Apps Developer Preview发布了 - 黑色 &#124; 黑色</title>
		<link>http://kix.in/2011/12/15/behind-the-mozilla-apps-developer-preview/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mozilla Labs Apps Developer Preview发布了 - 黑色 &#124; 黑色]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kix.in/?p=1346#comment-1539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 上的官方声明。要想深入了解 Mozilla Labs Apps 系统，请阅读博文 Behind the Mozilla Apps Developer Preview。 　　查看英文原文：Mozilla Labs Apps Developer Preview来自: InfoQ     新闻转载   [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 上的官方声明。要想深入了解 Mozilla Labs Apps 系统，请阅读博文 Behind the Mozilla Apps Developer Preview。 　　查看英文原文：Mozilla Labs Apps Developer Preview来自: InfoQ     新闻转载   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Behind the Mozilla Apps Developer Preview by StefanN</title>
		<link>http://kix.in/2011/12/15/behind-the-mozilla-apps-developer-preview/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StefanN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kix.in/?p=1346#comment-1531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I somehow don&#039;t get the point. Isn&#039;t the dashboard just a webpage with a collection of icons that opens a link in a new tab? I would hardly call this &quot;installation&quot;, even if you wrap Prism around it
The WebAPI project sounds interesting but it seems to be mobile only, apparently no plans to do real desktop-integration. On the site of the project the mentioned filesystem API is backed down to having W3Cs FileReader/Writer in Firefox. Is there a chance to enhance that API without learning C/C++?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I somehow don&#8217;t get the point. Isn&#8217;t the dashboard just a webpage with a collection of icons that opens a link in a new tab? I would hardly call this &#8220;installation&#8221;, even if you wrap Prism around it<br />
The WebAPI project sounds interesting but it seems to be mobile only, apparently no plans to do real desktop-integration. On the site of the project the mentioned filesystem API is backed down to having W3Cs FileReader/Writer in Firefox. Is there a chance to enhance that API without learning C/C++?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Behind the Mozilla Apps Developer Preview by devdanke</title>
		<link>http://kix.in/2011/12/15/behind-the-mozilla-apps-developer-preview/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[devdanke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 04:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kix.in/?p=1346#comment-1478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mozilla should fix the serious performance and stability problems in Firefox before wasting time reinventing the App Store concept.  Firefox marketshare is dropping rapidly due to poor browser quality.   Making Firefox fast and stable again should be Mozilla&#039;s top priority.

&quot;Mozilla Apps&quot; is a solution searching for a problem.  Any developer wanting to write a standard HTML5 based app for iOS or Android can already use PhoneGap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla should fix the serious performance and stability problems in Firefox before wasting time reinventing the App Store concept.  Firefox marketshare is dropping rapidly due to poor browser quality.   Making Firefox fast and stable again should be Mozilla&#8217;s top priority.</p>
<p>&#8220;Mozilla Apps&#8221; is a solution searching for a problem.  Any developer wanting to write a standard HTML5 based app for iOS or Android can already use PhoneGap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Behind the Mozilla Apps Developer Preview by Mozilla Apps &#8212; server side &#171; Fetchez le Python</title>
		<link>http://kix.in/2011/12/15/behind-the-mozilla-apps-developer-preview/#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mozilla Apps &#8212; server side &#171; Fetchez le Python]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kix.in/?p=1346#comment-1463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] EDIT : Anant wrote a very nice blog post on the topic [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EDIT : Anant wrote a very nice blog post on the topic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AES-256 using PHP-mcrypt by Bad Data error at CryptDecrypt when using AES 256 (MS CryptoAPI) &#124; SeekPHP.com</title>
		<link>http://kix.in/2008/07/22/aes-256-using-php-mcrypt/#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bad Data error at CryptDecrypt when using AES 256 (MS CryptoAPI) &#124; SeekPHP.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kix.in/?p=1142#comment-1450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (using pack) in php, and after I implemented the workaround(?) for AES vs Rijndael from here : http://kix.in/2008/07/22/aes-256-using-php-mcrypt/ I finaly have CryptDecrypt decrypting my PHP message&#8230; the problem is that it also still fails [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (using pack) in php, and after I implemented the workaround(?) for AES vs Rijndael from here : <a href="http://kix.in/2008/07/22/aes-256-using-php-mcrypt/" rel="nofollow">http://kix.in/2008/07/22/aes-256-using-php-mcrypt/</a> I finaly have CryptDecrypt decrypting my PHP message&#8230; the problem is that it also still fails [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building a REST Web Service in PHP by AbiusX</title>
		<link>http://kix.in/2006/06/06/building-a-rest-web-service-in-php/#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AbiusX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/blog/?p=8#comment-1440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why make it so complicateD?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why make it so complicateD?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why should you encrypt user data? by Jalkin Spriest</title>
		<link>http://kix.in/2011/08/02/why-should-you-encrypt-user-data/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jalkin Spriest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kix.in/?p=1290#comment-1423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You raise some really interesting points, however I think there is one thing you missed, and it is actually quite pertinent.  You said the following: 

&quot;and for good reason: it is damn [sic] hard to pull off.&quot;

When in fact it should have been &quot;...damned hard...&quot;

Let me explain.  &quot;Damn&quot; in itself is actually a verb.  I damn you, and you damn me, etc.  For some reason I consistently find it being used as an adjective without any kind of modification at all.  Though I understand that this is due to the common usage and the overall loss of the -d suffix, like in &quot;Iced Cream&quot; and how it becomes &quot;Ice Cream&quot;.  The cream has been Iced, people.  However, Anant, I am certainly correct in saying that you call it &quot;Mashed Potatoes&quot; rather than &quot;Mash Potatoes&quot;, so just for the sake of total consistency, you should most likely call it &quot;damned hard&quot;.  By the way, what the hell is your damned post about?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You raise some really interesting points, however I think there is one thing you missed, and it is actually quite pertinent.  You said the following: </p>
<p>&#8220;and for good reason: it is damn [sic] hard to pull off.&#8221;</p>
<p>When in fact it should have been &#8220;&#8230;damned hard&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Let me explain.  &#8220;Damn&#8221; in itself is actually a verb.  I damn you, and you damn me, etc.  For some reason I consistently find it being used as an adjective without any kind of modification at all.  Though I understand that this is due to the common usage and the overall loss of the -d suffix, like in &#8220;Iced Cream&#8221; and how it becomes &#8220;Ice Cream&#8221;.  The cream has been Iced, people.  However, Anant, I am certainly correct in saying that you call it &#8220;Mashed Potatoes&#8221; rather than &#8220;Mash Potatoes&#8221;, so just for the sake of total consistency, you should most likely call it &#8220;damned hard&#8221;.  By the way, what the hell is your damned post about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suspicion of Religion by Suvish</title>
		<link>http://kix.in/2010/09/12/suspicion-of-religion/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suvish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kix.in/?p=722#comment-1395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a problem with the assumptions of the author. The author assumes that the old ones were all deeply religious, and criticism of the religious views are a modern phenomenon. The simple fact is that this is not true. There were many people at that time who challenged the status quo. If I take Hinduism (too general a term) for an example, see the Carvaka philosophy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C4%81rv%C4%81ka). 

There has always been a need to explain the inexplicable. When the author says that we are a part of the whole and it is not possible to understand the whole through logic, I have to ask, is there another way? If there is, why are there so many? Which one to choose? How do I know if the one I chose is the right way? Humans have progressed throughout history using nothing but logic. Its logic that has saved him from falling prey in the stone age, its logic thats enabling me to communicate with you now. If one studies history, there are many points in which a superstitious thought has been invalidated through logic. This logic, is today known by a different name, &quot;Science&quot;.

I&#039;ve taken weed. It makes me high. After puffing on more than 2 joints, I feel like I know everything. All my doubts literally fade away. I can write a thought provoking book then. But the fact remains, that after sobering up and analyzing my morbid thoughts rationally, I realize how stupid it was.

There are many things that we do not know. Scientists try hard enough to decipher universe&#039;s secrets. They haven&#039;t claimed that they know everything. Somebody claiming to know stuff should back it up with concrete logic. Anything else is mere hand waving.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a problem with the assumptions of the author. The author assumes that the old ones were all deeply religious, and criticism of the religious views are a modern phenomenon. The simple fact is that this is not true. There were many people at that time who challenged the status quo. If I take Hinduism (too general a term) for an example, see the Carvaka philosophy (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C4%81rv%C4%81ka" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C4%81rv%C4%81ka</a>). </p>
<p>There has always been a need to explain the inexplicable. When the author says that we are a part of the whole and it is not possible to understand the whole through logic, I have to ask, is there another way? If there is, why are there so many? Which one to choose? How do I know if the one I chose is the right way? Humans have progressed throughout history using nothing but logic. Its logic that has saved him from falling prey in the stone age, its logic thats enabling me to communicate with you now. If one studies history, there are many points in which a superstitious thought has been invalidated through logic. This logic, is today known by a different name, &#8220;Science&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve taken weed. It makes me high. After puffing on more than 2 joints, I feel like I know everything. All my doubts literally fade away. I can write a thought provoking book then. But the fact remains, that after sobering up and analyzing my morbid thoughts rationally, I realize how stupid it was.</p>
<p>There are many things that we do not know. Scientists try hard enough to decipher universe&#8217;s secrets. They haven&#8217;t claimed that they know everything. Somebody claiming to know stuff should back it up with concrete logic. Anything else is mere hand waving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World’s first Ethical Hacker? by yeswanth</title>
		<link>http://kix.in/2006/03/09/world%e2%80%99s-first-ethical-hacker/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yeswanth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kix.in/?p=969#comment-1384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess things havent changed much over the years. Even when I was in second year, the same buzz about Ankit Fadia. Ofcourse that time I just saw his video and then decided I should leave the guy to his own fate and never bothered after that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess things havent changed much over the years. Even when I was in second year, the same buzz about Ankit Fadia. Ofcourse that time I just saw his video and then decided I should leave the guy to his own fate and never bothered after that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hello world! by yeswanth</title>
		<link>http://kix.in/2006/02/04/hello-world-2/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yeswanth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/blog/?p=48#comment-1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reached the end of the blog, I guess ;) Wonderful journey from here. I guess Steve Jobs was right in his Commenment Speech in Stanford,2005 that &quot;It doesnt make sense when looking forward but it makes sense when looking backward&quot; :) Thanks for taking me through your journey. I am definitely inspired now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reached the end of the blog, I guess <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Wonderful journey from here. I guess Steve Jobs was right in his Commenment Speech in Stanford,2005 that &#8220;It doesnt make sense when looking forward but it makes sense when looking backward&#8221; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Thanks for taking me through your journey. I am definitely inspired now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

